While not new concepts,
public and cultural diplomacy have subsequently become embracing elements
within the realm of international relations for not only establishing close
communication, but also developing long-term relationships. In the case
of the U.S. and China, over the past few years both nations have increased the
use of soft power methods to promote their respective cultures, values, and
ideals by interacting with other states, and more importantly
engaging with the foreign public.
Utilizing
two soft power methods of diplomacy the U.S. and China are pursuing new forms
of statecraft within their engagement with one another. One strong reason
behind this statement relates to the Chinese government's Confucius
Institute initiative, which first began in 2004. This public and
cultural diplomacy initiative made by China, was established to promote
cultural exchanges and the learning of Chinese language and culture.
Viewed as an instrument of
soft power the Confucius Institutes,which are housed by host
institutions, (majorly higher education institutions) focus on
building more peaceful relationships between China and other nations, by
promoting a deeper understanding of Chinese culture, values, and ideals.
Following suit, this past year, the U.S. approved funding new
introductory American Cultural Centers in China. These
centers, similar to the Confucius Institutes, promote
cultural and education exchange. However, not focusing on
English-language learning the American Cultural Centers provide a venue
for Chinese citizens to engage with U.S. citizens and develop a greater
understanding of the U.S. and American culture.
As major trade and
investment partners, China and the U.S. have acknowledged that in creating
a more collaborative partnership, both nations need to also strengthen their
understanding of each other's cultures. Using strategic
communication, one of the three dimensions of public diplomacy,[1] to
develop closer bilateral relations, both countries have placed a strong
emphasis on people-to-people exchanges through public and cultural diplomacy
efforts.
Pursuing
these initiatives, both countries have shown that they are progressively working toward becoming more focused
global partners[2], through their outreach approach
toward gaining foreign audience attention; and for the U.S. specifically, an
inward approach toward supporting its own citizen engagement to participate in
this cultural exchange.
_____________________
[1] Metzgar, T. Emily.
Public Diplomacy, Smith-Mundt, and the American Public. (2012). Communication
Law and Policy, 17:1, 67-101. Retrieved from:
http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/publications/METZGARPDSmithMundt&th eAmericanPublic.pdf.
Accessed on November 28, 2012.
* According to Joseph S.
Nye, there are three dimensions to public diplomacy:daily communication,
strategic communication and development of long-term relationships.
Equally important, all nations exercise some form of public diplomacy in
order to create and sustain connections with foreign publics in hopes of making
the world an easier place to implement their preferred foreign
policies.
[2] Hachigian, Nina. Re-thinking U.S.-China relations.19 November
2012. Retrieved from:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/19/hachigian-china-idUSL1E8MJ5TO20121119.
Thanks for your informative post on cultural diplomacy efforts from both the U.S. and China. Cultural institutes such as the American Centers and Confucius Institutes you mentioned definitely play an important role in fostering cultural exchange and diplomacy. Even in Taiwan, where the U.S. does not maintain official representation, there remains the American Institute in Taiwan. Another interesting manifestation of cultural exchange efforts between the two countries is the State Department initiative called "100,000 Strong", which aims to send 100,000 American students to China on exchange programs to increase cultural understanding and increase the numbers of Mandarin speakers in the U.S. It will definitely be interesting to see how exchanges between the two nations play out in the years to come, especially in the first few years of the new leadership in Beijing.
ReplyDelete