Our
class touched on an article written by Ann Marie Slaughter in The Atlantic, Adapting U.S. Policy in a Changing International System, to reinforce Manuel Castells’ definition of network-making power this week. Slaughter talks about how
the world network has evolved into one where collaborative power dominates. While realists generally view states as the main players
in network theory, Slaughter argues that the system is based on “a set of
complex, networked interactions among many different government and social
actors”. She states that the new network system is like a game of tennis:
instead of choosing your actions independently, as in the game of chess, you
must adapt and respond to changing circumstances. The world is now one of
“diverse actors interacting with one another in many different ways and
adapting to whatever circumstances arise as a result of that interaction”.
This
argument would fall under Castells’ fourth part of his explanation of network
power, network-making power. This power includes those who convene and setup
the networks. It claims that these actors have power over the rest of the
network since they facilitate it. Slaughter proposes that a diverse network of
actors in constant interactions with one another constitutes the network-making
power. This is exemplified in public diplomacy today. Various actors ranging
from organizations that facilitate cross-border exchanges to international news
outlets and public diplomacy foreign service officers all have specific roles in maintaining the network of relationships between states.
According
to Castells, “networks have power in their capacity to construct meaning”.
Along with network-making power,
Castells defines the following as all working together to frame individual or
collective minds.
Network
power: as in formatting a letter; the standardization of the network, the
protocols for how it is laid out.
Networking power: focuses on the actors in the
network; the act of gatekeeping.
Gatekeepers
are those who allow messages into the network; they control what information
circulates through the network and how. For example, the average user of Microsoft
Word can claim they know the program, but in reality only the creaters, the
“gatekeepers”, know the coding behind how the program is shown on the computer
and the processes it is able to complete.
Networked
power: focused on the nodes in the network, how powers are situated as a node
in a network of nodes; a node’s power is a property of the latticework it is
in.
Castells reinforces throughout Communication Power that “networks have power
in their capacity to construct meaning”. Each of these powers work together in
the formation and maintenance of a network. The current collective state of
network-making power, as Slaughter argues, is a force that countries need to
tap into more. These networks made up of small and middle powers in combination
with the large state powers create a stronger, more connected world better able
to conquer all issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment